|
|
|
|
In all of our companies, the
people who will make the justified decisions will
also be the performers of business. Thus
within the delegation of authority, the decision
maker will have the responsibility together with
his/her superior. Our aim here is to make
execution proactive instead of awaiting for the
decision of managers. The competent authority should
also approve the decisions quickly and should
consider the interests of company.
|
|
|
|
In case of unapproved decisions
and/or when there is disagreement between the
executer of business and the competent authority,
the case will be forwarded to a higher authority.
But it should be remembered that the preferred case
is the one in which the problems are solved before
forwarding them to the upper authority. The types of
the decisions that every rank can make are in
integrity with the Regulation of Authority in our
companies.
|
|
|
|
There was the necessity of
establishing a mechanism for the relations between
the Holding and our companies. The name of this
mechanism is; Committee of Execution. This Committe will make the necessary decisions by
considering the operations of our companies
according to the defined policies and goals.
|
|
|
|
|
The Committe of Execution consists of; |
|
|
|
1) |
|
CEO of Holding |
|
|
|
2) |
|
The Company General Manager and relevant
Departmant Managers related with the subject
of the meeting |
|
|
|
3) |
|
Relevant departmant manager of Holding |
|
|
|
The decisions of the Committe of
Execution are in a form of recommended decisions.
The Company General Managers are responsible for the
execution of these decisions. The meetings are done
at least once a month for each company. The number
of meetings can be increased according to the desire
of the members of the Committe of Execution.
|
|
|
|
It is within the authority of the
company General Manager whether or not to forward
the Committee of Execution decisions to the Board of
Directors.
|
|
|
|
« Back |
|
|